Friday, February 12, 2016

Derailed: Union Pacific puts brakes on Austin-San Antonio commuter rail | San Marcos Mercury | Local News from San Marcos and Hays County, Texas

Derailed: Union Pacific puts brakes on Austin-San Antonio commuter rail | San Marcos Mercury | Local News from San Marcos and Hays County, Texas







AUSTIN — Union Pacific
will no longer consider rerouting its Central Texas freight traffic to
make way for commuter rail between Georgetown and San Antonio, quite
possibly killing the decade-old effort to build a regional rail transit
system.



In 2009 and 2010, railroad executives
and Lone Star Rail District officials signed broad, non-binding
agreements to study the feasibility of implementing passenger rail
service on Union Pacific tracks along the Interstate 35 corridor. In a
Feb. 11 letter to Lone Star board chairman Sid Covington, however,
railroad brass said unambiguously that Union Pacific “can no longer, in
good faith, constrain its growth by the conceptual discussions or
previous expressions of interest between the parties.”



“Over the course of the past six-plus
years of meetings, discussions and studies, it has become apparent that
the desired track alignments and infrastructure requirements necessary
to support the efficient and reliable co-mingling of freight and
commuter passenger rail are unattainable,” writes Jerry S. Wilmoth, UP’s
general manager for network infrastructure. “In addition, UPRR
continually needs to analyze, develop and implement enhancements to its
network to meet customer demand in this vital and growing corridor.”



In a story published today,
the Austin American-Statesman quotes Lone Star Rail District general
counsel Bill Bingham as saying, “we’ll continue on, and we’ll keep
talking to Union Pacific. I think we’ll get this project done. I don’t
know when or how.”



More from the Austin American-Statesman:

The project has never been
able to advance beyond paper and computer screens. The 1997 legislation
gives the agency little taxation power — primarily the ability, with the
local jurisdictions’ permission, to tax small areas near train stations
— and no permission to run on the logical route, Union Pacific’s track.



Union Pacific’s position has always
been that it might be amenable to sharing its tracks, but only if a
parallel set of tracks was built well to the east of the I-35 corridor.



And, most significantly, Union Pacific —
which, when the economy is humming, runs two to three dozen freight
trains a day in that corridor — said the cost of that alternate track
would fall to the district. That would be more than $2 billion.
Conceptual plans for the LSTAR system
include a downtown San Marcos station and stops in Kyle-Buda and New
Braunfels. To partially fund construction of a future rail station and
related amenities, the San Marcos City Council voted in January 2012 to
create a 244-acre tax increment reinvestment zone centered around the
former Hays County Justice Center property, between LBJ Drive and
Guadalupe Street in the Central Business District.



SAWS pipeline builder struggling to pay the bills - San Antonio Express-News

SAWS pipeline builder struggling to pay the bills - San Antonio Express-News
Beset by financial difficulties, the company preparing to build a water pipeline from Burleson County to San Antonio is trying to sell 80 percent of its share of the project to a new, as-yet-unknown investor.
Abengoa Vista Ridge director Pedro Almagro told the San Antonio Water System’s board of trustees Tuesday that his company is behind on payments to some vendors and is soliciting proposals from potential financial backers.
Under a fall 2014 deal with SAWS, Abengoa Vista Ridge was to pay for design, engineering and construction of the a 142-mile pipeline that would draw up to 16.3 billion gallons a year from 18 wells in Burleson County. It would begin delivering water in 2020.
The arrangement between SAWS and Abengoa Vista Ridge is complex. The whole project is expected to cost $844 million. Abengoa Vista Ridge was supposed to put in $82 million but is seeking an equity partner to pay for 80 percent, Almagro said, which works out to $65.6 million.
Abengoa Vista Ridge would arrange for $762 million in tax-free bonds to be issued through the Mission Economic Development Corp. to finance the rest. SAWS has signed a contract to buy the water.
Including financing costs, San Antonio ratepayers would indirectly pay back the bondholders, Abengoa Vista Ridge and its partner a total of $3.4 billion over 30 years. SAWS will own the pipeline by 2050.
Abengoa’s decision to seek a new investor won’t affect SAWS ratepayers’ bills.
In late November, deeply indebted Spanish parent company Abengoa S.A. filed for creditor protection in Spain in the hopes of avoiding full-on bankruptcy. Negotiations between the company and its creditors must be complete by March 28, Almagro said.
Abengoa’s stock price has plunged since summer 2014 from a five-year high of $20.27 a share to 87 cents Tuesday.
Beset by financial difficulties, the company preparing to build a water pipeline from Burleson County to San Antonio is trying to sell 80 percent of its share of the project to a new, as-yet-unknown investor.
Abengoa Vista Ridge director Pedro Almagro told the San Antonio Water System’s board of trustees Tuesday that his company is behind on payments to some vendors and is soliciting proposals from potential financial backers.
Under a fall 2014 deal with SAWS, Abengoa Vista Ridge was to pay for design, engineering and construction of the a 142-mile pipeline that would draw up to 16.3 billion gallons a year from 18 wells in Burleson County. It would begin delivering water in 2020.
The arrangement between SAWS and Abengoa Vista Ridge is complex. The whole project is expected to cost $844 million. Abengoa Vista Ridge was supposed to put in $82 million but is seeking an equity partner to pay for 80 percent, Almagro said, which works out to $65.6 million.
Abengoa Vista Ridge would arrange for $762 million in tax-free bonds to be issued through the Mission Economic Development Corp. to finance the rest. SAWS has signed a contract to buy the water.
Including financing costs, San Antonio ratepayers would indirectly pay back the bondholders, Abengoa Vista Ridge and its partner a total of $3.4 billion over 30 years. SAWS will own the pipeline by 2050.
Abengoa’s decision to seek a new investor won’t affect SAWS ratepayers’ bills.
In late November, deeply indebted Spanish parent company Abengoa S.A. filed for creditor protection in Spain in the hopes of avoiding full-on bankruptcy. Negotiations between the company and its creditors must be complete by March 28, Almagro said.
Abengoa’s stock price has plunged since summer 2014 from a five-year high of $20.27 a share to 87 cents Tuesday.
Your browser does not support the <code>iframe</code> HTML tag. Try viewing this in a modern browser like Chrome, Safari, Firefox or Internet Explorer 9 or later.
The current contract with SAWS allows Abengoa Vista Ridge to seek an outside investor for up to 49 percent of its share, meaning Abengoa Vista Ridge would keep a controlling interest in the project. Lowering its share to 20 percent will require a revision, SAWS President and CEO Robert Puente said.
The revision must be approved by the SAWS board, but not the City Council, he said.
In a Jan. 13 letter hand-delivered to Abengoa’s San Antonio office, Puente wrote that Abengoa Water chairman and CEO Carlos Cosin told SAWS his company would need another month or two to reach financial close, a key milestone that was expected to come in May.
Puente asked Almagro for information about other companies that might get involved in Vista Ridge, a “comprehensive and realistic timeline” to financial close and quarterly financial statements from Abengoa Vista Ridge.
At Tuesday’s board meeting, SAWS Chairman Heriberto “Berto” Guerra Jr. publicly reminded Almagro that the contract allows SAWS to take over the project.
“We would prefer you do it,” Guerra said. “But, guess what, SAWS has built 50-plus-mile pipelines before, and we’re very, very good at it.”
SAWS officials previously have explained why they wanted a private company to build the pipeline instead of going it alone.
The utility’s most recent pipeline project now delivering groundwater pumped from the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer below Gonzales County via the Schertz-Seguin pipeline, gave the utility plenty of headaches — from shifting regulations in the Gonzales County Underground Water Conservation District to the expense of outreach to the people of the rural county.
At one point, SAWS had spent upwards of $30 million over 10 years before it had even obtained water permits from the district, Puente said in a November interview.
“We didn’t want to have to go through that again,” Puente said then. “So when we negotiated this contract, we told the respondents that all those kinds of risks, we wanted them to take.”
Asked Tuesday whether SAWS taking over the Vista Ridge looks more attractive in light of Abengoa’s difficulties, Puente said it does.
“As it progresses, yes, but we’re not there yet,” he said. “There’s still a whole lot to do before we get to that point.”
Six companies are in the process of submitting proposals to Abengoa Vista Ridge, company public relations manager Sapna Mulki said. She would not disclose them but described them as “developers” and “pure equity investors.”
“The project remains feasible and very interesting for many people,” Almagro told the SAWS board.
Guerra told Almagro that SAWS needs access to any proposals Abengoa Vista Ridge receives as soon as possible.
“Any company or group that would become an equity partner would have to agree with all the things we outlined to Abengoa Vista Ridge on that project,” Guerra said. “As long as they agree to everything that’s on there, then we, since we’re the customer, we would be more than happy to look at that particular company to see if they’re acceptable to us.”
Vista Ridge is a “critical” project for Abengoa, Almagro told the board — the kind of project that will move the company forward as it sells other assets all over the world. The company is selling its U.S. ethanol operation and solar projects in the Middle East, among others.
“The future is much more focused on engineering and construction,” Almagro said.
Asked by SAWS Trustee David McGee whether Abengoa Vista Ridge has paid all of its design, engineering and construction vendors on time, Almagro said: “There are some vendors that are not up to date.”
Almagro did not identify which vendors were not being paid, though he said San Antonio-based Pape-Dawson Engineers, the lead engineering consultant on the project, had voluntarily agreed to move to the back of the line.
“It has not been easy to get all the funds we need,” Almagro said.
Puente said he did not know specifically which vendors are not being paid.
“I know there are water well drillers that are complaining a lot,” he said.
Guerra also expressed concern about the idea of using fiberglass to build the 54-inch-diameter pipeline that SAWS is set to take over in 2050.
“At the end of 30 years … we take over the project for the next 30 years, and we want the quality of pipe we’re comfortable with,” he said. “The use of fiberglass pipe material is not acceptable to us.”
Almagro said his company understands and is discussing this with potential investors.
In November, the City Council voted for a water rate increase that would in part pay for the pipeline. The new rates raised the average residential bill from $51.75 to $55.65 and took effect Jan. 1. SAWS expects bills will rise to an average of $81.73 in 2020.
The rate increases will also pay for sewer upgrades required by the U.S. Environmental Protection agency and a plant to treat salty groundwater below South Bexar County.

bgibbons@express-news.net


Friday, November 20, 2015

City Council votes unanimously for water, sewer rate increases - San Antonio Express-News

City Council votes unanimously for water, sewer rate increases - San Antonio Express-News

The City Council voted unanimously this afternoon in favor of rate increases for water and sewer service, with a portion of the money eventually going to fund the controversial Vista Ridge pipeline.
Council members spent hours listening to residents and questioning SAWS President and CEO Robert Puente about plans to ensure low-income residents can sign up for the utility’s affordability program and efforts to continue water conservation in the future.
Adding to the heated debate over the higher rates was the pipeline, which will carry water to San Antonio from 142 miles away, farther than any other water project in the city’s history. The pipeline is expected to deliver 16.3 billions gallons of water a year from an aquifer below Burleson County.
District 1 Councilman Roberto Trevino secured a commitment from Puente to meet with council members every six months to monitor the effects of rate increases and the affordability program.
District 8 Councilman Ron Nirenberg proposed requiring SAWS and pipeline builder Abengoa to set up a fund to help Burleson County residents pay for repairs if the project harms their water wells.
The only council member who didn’t vote was Ray Lopez of District 6, who was absent on a trade trip to Japan.
Vista Ridge has weathered a wave of opposition that grew more vocal ahead of the SAWS board of trustees vote on Oct. 27 to endorse the rate restructuring, sending it to City Council for final approval.
The rate hikes would also pay for a plant now under construction in South Bexar County to treat salty groundwater — another new source of supply — and sewer improvements required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as well as other projects.
SAWS’ rates have climbed nearly every year for residential and large-scale users since 2006, utility records show.
The new rates will take effect Jan. 1, and SAWS has forecasted that bills will continue to rise so that the average residential user will see a 50 percent higher monthly water and sewer bill by 2020.
Check out ExpressNews.com later today to see how much your bill will go up and read more about the council’s vote.
Read in-depth coverage of the pipeline at ExpressNews.com.
bgibbons@express-news.net
Twitter: @bgibbs

Texas pipeline to drain rural county, soak city ratepayers - Watchdog.org

Texas pipeline to drain rural county, soak city ratepayers - Watchdog.org

Under federal orders to fix its leaky sewer system, San Antonio is doubling down with a $3.4 billion pipeline that will pump up water bills by 50 percent over five years. The EPA has no problem with that.
The City Council green-lighted the Vista Ridge pipeline to draw water from Burleson County 140 miles to the east. The controversial project — the largest in the history of the city water system — is branded a boondoggle by critics. An independent study warned it was “high risk.”
“People in Burleson County are outraged,” said Linda Curtis, director of Independent Texans and resident of nearby Bastrop.
Bob Martin, president of the Homeowner-Taxpayer Association of Bexar County, said San Antonio Water System customers are getting soaked. “We don’t know what’s coming after the five-year rate increase,” he said.
Over the next 10-12 years, SAWS is under a federal consent order to spend $492 million more to repair or replace lines that have been prone to sewer overflows.
SAWS critics say the system’s crumbling infrastructure reflects shoddy maintenance and fails to inspire confidence in management. Anger over the rate increases boiled over at a five-hour public hearing Thursday.
The business community gave political cover to the City Council, endorsing the Vista Ridge project and higher water charges.
Henry Cisneros, a former mayor and secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development under Bill Clinton, told Watchdog.org he supports the SAWS package as board chairman of the Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce.
“It threads the needle,” he said of the plan.
SAWS’ new rate schedule will reduce costs for residential users consuming fewer than 5,000 gallons monthly. Businesses and residents exceeding that low threshold will get sharply higher bills.
Overall, SAWS says, San Antonio’s average monthly water bill of $58.60 is lower than those in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston and Austin.
While pushing water conservation with its more steeply tiered rates, San Antonio figures to get more pricey as costs kick in for EPA compliance and the new Vista Ridge pipeline.
SAWS states that Vista Ridge will ensure a reliable water supply for a metro area that regularly struggles with drought conditions. Opponents respond that San Antonio’s giant Edwards Aquifer has an estimated 200 to 300 years of life remaining – though the federal government has restricted expansion amid concerns about endangered lizards.
Despite fears about groundwater losses in agricultural-dependent Burleson and Milam counties — recalling the death spiral experienced by California’s Owens Valley when its water was appropriated by Los Angeles — the EPA has registered no objections over Vista Ridge, yet.
Ultimately, Martin says San Antonio’s aggressive annexation agenda endangers residents.
“Look at the cost of runaway growth as the city considers future business tax abatements and other benefits. This growth has caused city taxes and utility rates to skyrocket,” he said.
Kenric Ward writes for the Texas Bureau of Watchdog.org. Contact him atkward@watchdog.org.

San Antonio water and sewer rates going up Jan. 1 - San Antonio Express-News

San Antonio water and sewer rates going up Jan. 1 - San Antonio Express-News



City Council approved San Antonio Water System’s requested rate increases Thursday but directed the utility to improve access to discounts, help residents who receive inexplicably high monthly bills and continue conserving water.

Council members grilled SAWS President and CEO Robert Puente ahead of their unanimous vote on the new rates that will fund several water and sewer projects, including the controversial Vista Ridge pipeline that would deliver up to 16.3 billion gallons a year from the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer below Burleson County, 142 miles away.

The added revenue will also fund a plant now under construction to desalinate salty groundwater below South Bexar County, sewer improvements required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and smaller pipelines to provide water to the city’s military bases.

The vote means SAWS customers will see an increase in sewer and water delivery fees startingJan. 1, but the approval also set in place yearly increases to the water supply fee that could add up to nearly 21 percent by 2020.

As a result, SAWS estimates the average residential customer’s monthly water and sewer billcould rise 50 percent by 2020 from $54.34 to $81.73, based on 7,092 gallons of water used.

District 1 Councilman Roberto Treviño said council should continue monitoring the effect of the rates on customers who can least afford the increases. He secured a commitment from Puente to hold update meetings every six months, the first in June.

District 4 Councilman Rey Saldaña spent half an hour asking Puente questions about water conservation, the availability of groundwater in Burleson County and what SAWS is doing for residents who have been seeing high bills because of leaks or meter errors.

Puente told him SAWS’ conservation measures have reduced demand so as to eliminate the need for at least three Vista Ridge projects since the 1980s, even as the city has grown.

Though Puente said SAWS considers conservation not a “tree-hugging measure” but an actual water supply, Saldana credited groups like the Esperanza Peace & Justice Center, Fuerza Unida, the Southwest Workers Union and Alamo Sierra Club for pushing conservation over the years in their opposition to various water supply projects.

“Those are all things that don’t come without the other end of the table applying pressure,” he said.

Puente also told him that SAWS is using computer programs to track extraordinarily high bills so the staff can notify customers.

On conservation, District 8 Councilman Ron Nirenberg suggested amending city ordinances to make Stage 1 drought restrictions permanent. He also pushed for an updated water plan from SAWS.

He and Puente agreed that SAWS needs to make sure video and supporting documents for all SAWS board meetings are posted online.

Nirenberg also suggested meeting with SAWS and Abengoa, the Spanish company that would build the pipeline, to consider creating a fund to assist residents near the project’s well field who fear pumping so much water for the pipeline will mean they have to lower their well pumps at their own expense.

For District 3 Councilwoman Rebecca Viagran, the vote was about funding much-needed repairs, like a sewer line in her home neighborhood on the South Side. She also stressed the need to pay for water projects today before they become more expensive in the future.

“I cannot ignore my responsibility to my constituents and to the children of our community who will be left holding the bill if we kick this issue down the road,” she said.

District 5 Councilwoman Shirley Gonzales asked several questions about affordability and bill errors. She spoke about a family in her district who recently received a monthly bill of $450.

SAWS CFO Doug Evanson explained that the software used to track errors flags those bills that reach 600 percent of average use.

“I’m afraid that benchmark is too high,” Gonzales said.

The vote followed four hours of comments by city and SAWS staff and residents.

Several members of the Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce, the North San Antonio Chamber of Commerce and the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce spoke in favor of the rate increases and the pipeline.

Hispanic Chamber president Ramiro Cavazos said his group’s members had visited the Spain headquarters of Abengoa three times. They are convinced the project is a sound one, he said.

“It makes good sense to bring water from water-rich East Texas to water-poor south-central Texas,” he said.

Social justice and environmental groups have packed public hearings in the weeks leading up to the vote to protest the pipeline and rate increases, which they say place an unfair burden on poor ratepayers.

“They wonder why our community doesn’t vote and this is a perfectly good reason,” said Graciela Sanchez, Esperanza’s director. “We’re the ones talking to the community. We’re the ones representing them …because they can’t be here. But we don’t have to go to council because nobody pays attention to us anyway.”

SAWS’ rates have climbed nearly every year for residential and large-scale users since 2006, utility records show.

Before the vote, District 10 Councilman Mike Gallagher said the city “can’t wait for a crisis to make a decision. Think about what those costs would be to each and every one of us.”

District 6 Councilman Ray Lopez, away on a trade trip to Japan, was the only one not present for the vote.

bgibbons@express-news.net

Twitter: @bgibbs

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Support Grows for Huge Water Plan as Council Vote Looms | News Radio 1200 WOAI

Support Grows for Huge Water Plan as Council Vote Looms | News Radio 1200 WOAI

Support for that very controversial 'Vista Ridge' water supply deal is
snowballing ahead of tomorrow's critical vote at City Hall on a scheme
to jack up water rates by 16% over the coming to years to, in part, pay
for the $3.4 billion agreement, News Radio 1200 WOAI reports.
 
All of the local Chambers of Commerce, in a joint statement, urged City
Council to approve the rate arrangement, saying unless Vista Ridge is
approved, the Pentagon may begin pulling up stakes as the three big
military bases in the area when the next round of base closings takes
place in 2017.

"One of the primary reasons we support the SAWS
rate adjustment and infrastructure investments is because it allows us
to commit to our military installations that they would no longer be
mandated to operate under Stage 4 water restrictions, and allows them to
have a consistent, dependable source of water in the event of miltary
emergencies," said Richard Perez, President of the San Antonio Chamber
of Commerce.

The Chambers say a lack of dependable water is the
number one concern of the Pentagon as it considers whether to invest
more money into San Antonio facilities, and it has made clear that it
will not continue to support a major military infrastructure in the city
if it can't be assured of a supply of water.

The Defense Department has invested more than $2 billion at Ft. Sam Houston after
the BRAC made the decision in 2005 to consolidate military medical
operations and training at San Antonio Military Medical Center.

The Chambers say nobody likes to may higher rates, but they point out
the 'fundamental importance of water resources' which is needed to
attract businesses, create new jobs, and support existing businesses
looking to expand.

State Rep. Lyle Larson (R-San Antonio) has
said that when companies in the Rust Belt indicate a desire to relocate
to Texas, the first thing they're shown by economic development officers
in Michigan or Ohio are pictures of the 2011 Texas drought, where, in
many cases, water had to be trucked in to keep business operations
running.

“Without reliable water, sites like were we are
standing today would have a difficult time encouraging new businesses,”
Stephen Shadrock of the South San Antonio Chamber of Commerce said.

North side Council Member Joe Krier echoed those concerns as he announced plans to vote for the project.
 
Conservation isn't enough,” Krier said, citing a demand by Vista Ridge opponents to
focus more on water conservation and adopting a ‘slow growth’ strategy. 
“Hardly anyone who is familiar with our existing water supplies and
growth projections believes that conservation alone will yield the water
we'll need to accommodate our city's growth.  We need new supplies for
our residents and the companies that either want to add jobs in San
Antonio or bring in new ones. Without water security, businesses would
eventually look elsewhere to expand or relocate. That result would hurt
all of us.”

Opponents, who have gotten far more vocal in the
past week, say Vista Ridge is simply a payoff to wealthy, powerful
developers who want to continue adding neighborhoods over the Aquifer
Recharge Zone and force working class ratepayers to foot the bill.